Written by Paul Brown | Last updated 17.11.2025 | 12 minute read
From tax systems and licensing services to health records and social care, modern government runs on data. Yet in many public sector organisations, data still lives in isolated legacy systems, stitched together by manual workarounds and fragile integrations. The result is a fragmented picture of citizens, services and outcomes – and a constant tension between the need to share data and the obligation to protect it.
This is where specialist GovTech consultancy for data platforms comes into its own. Rather than simply “modernising IT”, it focuses on designing secure, interoperable government data flows that allow departments, agencies and delivery partners to work together, safely and at scale. Done well, it transforms how policy is made, how services are delivered, and how public value is demonstrated.
The first contribution of a GovTech consultancy is to reframe data platforms as strategic assets, not technical infrastructure. Too many government transformation programmes begin with a technology decision and only later ask what problem they are solving for citizens or frontline staff. A good consultancy reverses this order. It starts with policy goals, service outcomes and regulatory constraints, and then designs data flows and platform capabilities that directly support those priorities.
At this strategic level, the goal is to create a shared language between policy, operations, digital teams and security specialists. Business owners can describe the decisions they need to make, the risks they must manage and the key performance indicators they must track. Technologists can translate those into data domains, integration patterns and platform services. Security and legal experts can articulate what “good” looks like in terms of confidentiality, integrity, availability and lawful processing. GovTech consultants sit in the middle, making these different perspectives intelligible to one another and aligning them around a common model.
That strategic alignment is particularly important in a context where government must balance competing pressures. Ministers want visible change quickly. Departments want autonomy over their systems and budgets. Regulators demand demonstrable compliance and controls. Citizens expect seamless services, but are increasingly sensitive to how their data is used. The role of consultancy here is to navigate these tensions and shape a data platform vision that is ambitious but realistic – one that can be delivered in stages, delivers early value, and builds trust over time.
Security is not something that can be bolted onto a government data platform after the architecture is agreed. For GovTech consultancies, “secure by design” is the starting point: every component, integration and process is designed with explicit consideration of threats, vulnerabilities and regulatory obligations. This requires more than general information security expertise; it needs a specific understanding of public sector threat models, risk appetites, and the practical realities of operating in complex, multi-supplier environments.
A robust security architecture begins with classification. Not all data is equal: some is open by default, some is sensitive but low risk, and some is highly confidential or safety-critical. A consultancy will help the organisation define clear classification schemes and tie them to concrete technical controls: network zoning, encryption requirements, access controls, monitoring and incident response procedures. The platform can then enforce differentiated protections in a systematic way, rather than relying on ad hoc measures in individual systems.
From there, modern public sector data platforms are often designed around a “zero trust” model. Instead of assuming that anything inside a government network is safe, zero trust treats every access request as untrusted until proven otherwise. This translates into strong identity and access management, fine-grained authorisation, and continuous verification based on device health, user behaviour and contextual risk signals. Consultants help government organisations select appropriate identity providers, design role-based or attribute-based access control models, and define joiner-mover-leaver processes that keep access aligned with organisational changes.
At the same time, they must ensure that strong security does not become an excuse for poor user experience or institutional inertia. One of the most valuable interventions a consultancy can make is to show that security and usability can reinforce each other when approached thoughtfully. For example, they might design consent flows that are clear and meaningful to citizens, or simplify authentication journeys for frontline workers while still meeting assurance requirements. Security becomes a visible part of service quality rather than a hidden tax on productivity.
To make this practical, consultancies typically advocate for a layered security model within the data platform, combining:
By integrating these layers into a coherent architecture, the platform can support secure data flows not only within a single department but across multiple organisations and jurisdictions, with clear lines of accountability for each control.
Interoperability is where the promise of government data platforms meets the messy reality of legacy systems, inconsistent standards and organisational silos. GovTech consultancy is often brought in specifically to tackle this challenge: enabling data flows between departments and agencies that have independently evolved technology stacks, data models and operating cultures over decades.
The first task is usually diagnostic rather than architectural. Consultants work with stakeholders to map data ecosystems: who holds what data, in which systems, for which purposes, under what legal bases and technical constraints. This exercise surfaces duplication, gaps, conflicting definitions and hidden “shadow integrations” where teams have built short-term fixes that quietly become critical dependencies. The result is a clearer picture of where interoperability genuinely adds value – and where the costs and risks of integration may outweigh the benefits.
With that context, a consultancy can then design an interoperability strategy that uses multiple patterns rather than a single silver bullet. Not every integration needs a real-time API, and not every data source is suitable for replication into a central warehouse or lake. Instead, they might propose a blend of event-driven messaging, publish-and-subscribe data products, shared reference data services and carefully governed bulk extracts, each chosen for specific use cases such as operational service delivery, analytics or regulatory reporting.
Importantly, interoperability in government is as much about semantics as it is about technology. Two agencies can exchange data seamlessly at the technical level and still misunderstand each other if they use the same terms to mean different things. Consultancies therefore invest significant effort in defining shared vocabularies, canonical data models or at least mapping layers that make those differences visible and manageable. This often involves convening domain experts from different organisations and guiding them through the hard work of agreeing definitions, acceptable values and quality standards.
Finally, there is a cultural dimension. Some departments may be wary of sharing data for fear of being blamed if something goes wrong; others may see their datasets as a source of power and resist perceived encroachment. A skilled GovTech consultancy helps to shift this mindset by designing governance models that allocate clear responsibilities, by demonstrating early wins from collaboration, and by embedding transparency into how data flows are authorised, monitored and reviewed. Over time, this can move the organisation from a posture of “data hoarding” to one of “responsible data stewardship” across the public sector.
However elegant the technology, government data platforms only succeed if they are supported by strong governance and clear operating models. GovTech consultancies play a crucial role in designing these structures so that secure, interoperable data flows are not dependent on heroic efforts by individuals, but institutionalised into day-to-day operations.
One of the key design decisions is how to balance central coordination with local ownership. A purely centralised model, where a single team controls all data and integration decisions, quickly becomes a bottleneck and discourages innovation. A purely federated model, where every department goes its own way, leads straight back to fragmentation and inconsistent standards. Consultancies often advocate for a hybrid approach: a small central function sets guardrails, defines common standards and operates shared platform services, while domain teams retain responsibility for their own data products and pipelines within those guardrails.
This central function typically owns the data governance framework. That includes policies for data classification, retention and disposal; processes for approving new data flows; and mechanisms for managing data quality issues and access requests. A consultancy will help design these processes to be as light-touch as possible while still meeting regulatory requirements. For example, they might create different approval routes for low-risk internal analytics versus high-risk external data sharing, so that routine activities are not unduly delayed.
Standards are another vital part of the picture. Technical standards for APIs, event formats, metadata and security controls ensure that teams across government can build on the same foundations, reducing integration friction and avoiding repeated design debates. Data standards – for identifiers, reference data, and common entities such as people, organisations and locations – further improve interoperability and data quality. Consultants can help rationalise existing standards, align them with international best practice where appropriate, and define pragmatic adoption pathways that recognise the constraints of legacy systems.
Beyond formal governance, operating models must address skills, incentives and ways of working. Many public sector organisations struggle to recruit and retain data engineers, architects and security specialists in a competitive market. A GovTech consultancy can advise on sourcing strategies, hybrid team structures with suppliers, and capability-building programmes for existing staff. They can also introduce agile and product-centric ways of working, where data platforms and data products are managed as evolving services with roadmaps and feedback loops, rather than as one-off projects that are “finished” on go-live.
Crucially, governance in this context is not just about controlling risk; it is about enabling value. A well-designed framework makes it easier, not harder, for teams to discover data, build new data flows, and experiment with innovative analytics or AI use cases. By making expectations clear, standardising common patterns and providing self-service tooling where appropriate, the governance model becomes a catalyst for responsible innovation across government rather than a brake on progress.
Most governments are starting from a landscape dominated by legacy systems, bespoke integrations and departmental silos. The journey to secure, interoperable data platforms can feel daunting. GovTech consultancies add value not only by designing the target architecture but by shaping a pragmatic roadmap that respects financial, political and operational realities.
A common starting point is to identify a small number of high-impact use cases that cut across organisational boundaries. These might involve improving a specific citizen journey, reducing fraud and error in a benefits system, or enabling better forecasting in a critical policy area. By focusing on concrete outcomes, the roadmap anchors technical work in visible benefits and provides a narrative that resonates with senior leaders and front-line teams alike.
To turn these use cases into a structured programme, consultancies often recommend breaking the roadmap into several interlocking streams:
This multi-stream approach allows progress to be made at different levels simultaneously. For example, as the platform team establishes core services, a domain team can begin developing a specific data product using an interim pattern, with a plan to migrate it to the new platform when ready. Likewise, governance can be piloted on a subset of data flows and refined before wider rollout. A consultancy’s role is to coordinate these efforts, manage dependencies and help keep the overall direction consistent even as local details evolve.
Another critical aspect of the roadmap is dealing with legacy systems and technical debt. Very few public sector organisations can afford a wholesale replacement of their estate, and big-bang cutovers carry enormous risks. Instead, consultancies advocate for a phased approach that includes:
Throughout this journey, transparency and stakeholder engagement are essential. Data flows often cross organisational and even jurisdictional boundaries, touching on sensitive topics such as surveillance, discrimination and algorithmic fairness. GovTech consultancies help government clients build trust by publishing clear information about how data is used, by involving civil society and subject-matter experts in the design of data initiatives, and by embedding ethical review into decision-making around analytics and AI. When problems do occur – as they inevitably will in any complex programme – a culture of openness and learning makes it easier to correct course and maintain public confidence.
Ultimately, the goal is not simply to build a technically impressive data platform, but to create an environment where secure, interoperable data flows are the norm rather than the exception. That means that when a new policy is proposed or a new service is being designed, questions about data relationships, interoperability and risk are asked early and answered confidently. It means front-line staff can access the information they need without resorting to insecure workarounds. And it means citizens can see the benefits of joined-up government in faster decisions, more personalised services and more transparent accountability.
GovTech consultancy acts as the bridge between aspiration and execution on this journey. By combining technical depth with an understanding of public value, regulation and organisational change, it enables governments to design data platforms that are not only secure and interoperable, but genuinely transformative for the people they serve.
Is your team looking for help with GovTech consultancy? Click the button below.
Get in touch